BofA Starts Charging $5 Monthly Fee For DEBIT CARD Use

This is some BS! Good thing I have a 2nd checking account, I doubt I will stay with them any longer. Banks can no longer charge merchants 44 cents per transaction & only 21 cents according to the Federal Reserve this is a “reasonable and proportional” amount. So now we (the customers) have to pay an extra $60 a year to make up for the $2 billion that BofA will loose in revenue…GTFOH!!!

LA Times reports — New federal debit card rules won’t kick in until Saturday. But Bank of America wasted no time in announcing a $5 monthly fee for debit card purchases to make up for the expected drop in revenue. The rules in question limit how much banks can charge to process debit card transactions. Those fees now average 44 cents per sale and are paid by merchants. After Saturday, banks won’t be able to charge more than 21 cents.

The Federal Reserve has determined that this is a “reasonable and proportional” amount, reflecting how much it actually costs banks to process a debit card transaction. For its part, BofA has estimated that these new rules will cost it about $2 billion annually in lost revenue. Industrywide, these processing fees brought in $19 billion for banks in 2009, according to the Nilson Report, which tracks card payments.

So here comes a $5 fee to use your debit card, effective early next year, whether you make one purchase a month or 100. Anne Pace, a BofA spokeswoman, told me the new regulations have changed “the economics of offering a debit card.”

She said customers rely on such services as fraud and overdraft protection, and those services can’t be offered for free. “That convenience comes at a cost,” Pace said. But let’s stop and think about this for a second. The Fed says 21 cents is a fair amount for banks to charge for processing debit card sales. BofA isn’t saying it’s going to lose money by charging this amount.

What it’s actually saying is that it will make less money from debit cards by having to charge a reasonable rate. And apparently the bank just can’t stomach having to tell shareholders that their pockets won’t be bulging quite as much as before. So it’s slapping customers with a hefty fee — $60 a year — to keep the cash flowing in.

Do the math: BofA has 57 million consumer and small-business accounts. If a majority of them uses debit cards, we’re talking a windfall of about $3 billion a year — or $1 billion more than BofA is currently making from transaction fees. Meanwhile, Wells Fargo is set to begin testing a $3 monthly debit card fee in Georgia, New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon and Washington. Chase is experimenting with a similar fee in Wisconsin.

“We bailed out the banks, and now they want more money?” asked Susan Kirk, who receives her California unemployment benefits via a BofA debit card. “These people are just greedy.”

At least Kirk and about 1 million other Californians receiving unemployment benefits through BofA debit cards can take solace that the new $5 fee won’t affect them. The state Employment Development Department says the monthly fee won’t apply to its beneficiaries. The bank says it won’t hit people with the fee for ATM transactions or if they don’t use their debit card for purchases. It also won’t shake you down if you have your mortgage at BofA or at least $20,000 in combined balances at the bank.

But many people will be unable to dodge the bullet. These are the people who don’t have $20,000 extra sitting in the bank. These are the people who singed their fingers using credit cards and have prudently switched instead to debit cards.

These are the people who bought into banks’ line that debit cards represent state-of-the-art convenience, and that this is a more efficient and eco-friendly way of accessing your money than using checks. I asked BofA’s Pace how much it really costs the bank to process a debit card transaction. She declined to answer.

I asked how much it costs the bank to provide fraud and overdraft protection. She declined to answer. I simply asked how many debit card users the bank has. She declined to answer.

Nevertheless, Pace said that BofA is “trying to be clear and transparent with customers” about its fees. The problem, of course, is that until BofA and other banks come clean on how much it really costs them to process plastic and provide related services, we have to take others’ word for it. The Fed says 21 cents is a realistic fee for a debit card sale.

Some consumer advocates say the actual cost to banks, thanks to the huge volume of automated transactions processed daily, is closer to a penny or two. In this light, that $5 monthly fee is pure gravy. Put another way, BofA isn’t just having its cake and eating it too. It’s serving itself another piece.

David Lazarus’ column runs Tuesdays and Fridays. He also can be seen daily on KTLA-TV Channel 5. Send your tips or feedback to david.lazarus@latimes.com.

About these ads

BofA To Cut At Least 40,000 Jobs

LA Times reports — Bank of America Corp. is preparing to slash 40,000 or more jobs nationwide, a dramatic retrenchment that reflects the deepening woes of the country’s largest bank and the magnitude of the U.S. economic slowdown. The layoffs will come mainly from the BofA’s sprawling consumer-banking operations, which will take a heavy toll on branches, loan centers and other offices throughout California.

Bank of America has 45,000 employees in the state, about 1 in 6 of its nearly 300,000-person workforce, and is expected to roll out the job cuts over the next several years. The company, which for years was based in San Francisco and maintains its huge mortgage unit in Calabasas, also is in the process of closing 10% of its branches nationwide. California has the highest concentration of BofA branches in the U.S. with 956 throughout the state, though it has been losing ground in recent years to rivals like Wells Fargo & Co. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.

The layoffs are another blow to California, with its battered economy and nearly 12% unemployment rate. From tellers to middle managers, laid-off Bank of America employees are likely to have a tough time finding new jobs.

“We don’t need to lose any jobs in this environment, whether in financial services or anywhere else,” said Esmael Adibi, a Chapman University economist.

The details of the cutbacks were not officially announced, but the information was disclosed by three Bank of America executives who have been briefed on the plan but were not authorized to speak publicly. Brian Moynihan, Bank of America’s beleaguered chief executive, is expected to unveil details at an investor conference Monday in New York.

Investors sent shares of the BofA down 3.1% to $6.98 on Friday on a day banks led the overall market sharply lower on more worries about global economies falling into a recession. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 303.68, or 2.7%, to 10,992.13

Executives met at the bank’s Charlotte, N.C., headquarters Thursday and Friday to finalize the plan, which has been under discussion for months. Moynihan is grappling with how to wring more profit from the bank’s core customer base, which includes about 58 million consumer and small-business accounts.

At least one analyst said the cutbacks could weigh heavily on BofA’s millions of Southern California customers, who would have to deal with fewer branches and longer lines for tellers.

“You’re definitely going to see decreased service levels for consumers,” said Christopher Whalen, a bank analyst at Institutional Risk Analytics. “They’re talking about either closing branches or reducing the head count in the branches.”

Moynihan hopes to fashion a smaller but more focused company that can withstand the fallout from its disastrous 2008 takeover of mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp. in Calabasas. The home-lending unit has run up $30 billion in losses, and faces billions more in potential liability from a barrage of mortgage-related lawsuits.

Federal regulators and private investors allege that Countrywide misled them about the quality of loans and bonds tied to high-risk mortgages bought during the housing boom. Earlier this month, federal regulators sued Bank of America and 16 rivals, contending that the banks sold loans to housing goliaths Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under false pretenses.

Bank of America’s retrenchment is also being driven by the slack U.S. economy and darkening outlook for the banking industry. Intensifying worries about its prospects have cut Bank of America’s stock price by more than half since mid-January, a far larger hit than its peers have suffered.

“The financial-services industry as a whole is going to shrink,” said Nancy Bush, a banking analyst and contributing editor at research firm SNL Financial. “We don’t need as many loans, as many credit cards, as many mortgages as we did in the past two decades.”

The flailing economy has struck particularly hard at Bank of America, which critics say has been beset by poor management and a flawed growth strategy of rapid-fire acquisitions of other companies. To overcome its woes, BofA executives have worked for much of the past year on the ambitious restructuring known as Project New BAC, a reference to the ticker symbol for the company’s stock.

Moynihan has made a number of bold steps in recent weeks, including signing on billionaire Warren Buffett as a major shareholder. This week he ousted two senior executives, including Sallie Krawcheck, one of the highest-ranking women on Wall Street.

The first phase of New BAC is designed to streamline the consumer businesses, including home loans, credit cards and wealth management. It also will make cuts in the corporate support staff, such as legal, marketing, human relations and finance employees.

The bank previously had announced another 6,000 job cuts this year and has closed, sold or put on the auction block former Countrywide divisions that made loans through independent brokers, bought loans from smaller lenders and sold specialty insurance.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,773 other followers

%d bloggers like this: